Complex trauma, moral injury, resilience: the mechanisms by which adverse experience becomes psychological injury, and the conditions under which people genuinely recover. Two studies in, with the doctoral stage of the work now taking shape.
The Through-line
My work so far isn’t a scatter of topics. It’s a single arc: how harm forms, how it injures, and how people recover from it.
Psychological need satisfaction and frustration, the Dark Tetrad, and gender-role beliefs in relation to violent-extremist attitudes among university students. A study of how adverse psychological conditions become the capacity to do harm.
Moral injury and depressive symptoms among frontline healthcare workers in Pakistan, examining the roles of clinical empathy and perceived stress. Suffering that follows not from fear, but from acts that violate one’s moral world.
Resilience treated as a process, not a trait: mechanisms that can be identified, measured, and strengthened. The precise question stays open on purpose: it sharpens against a particular lab’s methods and its data, and should arrive narrower than it starts.
Research to Date
A quantitative study of a population with high exposure to morally injurious events and almost no representation in the moral-injury literature, examining how moral injury relates to depression, and what clinical empathy and perceived stress do to that relationship.
Approved and forthcoming as a publication. The earliest thread of my interest in how adverse psychological conditions become harm.
Two theses. One paper in press. That is the whole record, and I’d rather show you a small, real one than an inflated one.
Early by definition. What it carries is the question, the method, and the access. A publication count at this stage would measure how long I had been at it, not what the work is.
Why Pakistan Matters
The literature on complex trauma and moral injury is built overwhelmingly on Western, English-speaking samples. The populations I can reach are the ones the field keeps writing “future research should examine” about.
Clinical and research access in both languages, including the ability to work with translated and culturally adapted measures, and to know when they don’t fit.
A practising clinician’s reach into hospital and community settings in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, including the frontline healthcare workers of my thesis work.
For a lab, this isn’t a diversity footnote. It’s the ability to test whether the field’s core findings hold outside the samples they were built on.
Beyond the Transcript
The records below are accurate and complete. The column beside them is the part a transcript has no field for.
What the transcript says
What it can’t show
I practise as a clinical psychologist while I research. The questions come from the therapy room, and the findings walk back into it.
Bilingual, clinician-level access to under-represented populations in Pakistan. A genuine empirical asset, not a line in a diversity statement.
Quantitative design, psychometrics, and SPSS across two completed studies, and the appetite to learn whatever methods a new question needs.
A psychology lecturer with published science-communication essays. Comfortable explaining the work to a classroom, a journal, or the public.
Contact
A collaboration, a doctoral position, or an honest read on fit. Any of the three. One email is enough to start.
Prospective therapy client instead? My practice lives here →